![]() ![]() Too high or too low on Zack Moss? You decide. Chicago is out from underneath Mitchell Trubisky, so expect that offense to be in flux for a little while now (but likely headed in the “right” direction). He’s small, had questionable competition, but certainly appears explosive enough. I like the build at 6-2, 216, and he’s fairly high-end across the board (80th percentile, or higher) at multiple metrics of note:Įno Benjamin checked a lot of boxes pre-draft, but his near-undrafted status should be a red flag, especially on a roster that wants to go four wide and pass – a lot.ĭarnell Mooney was one of this year’s late-game riser (right up to the weeks that preceded the draft). Gabriel Davis probably is my favorite bet for “chance to outplay” draft position. So, going through these four rounds, most of this won’t look too surprising to you guys if you caught the earlier tweets/takes. I’ve been sharing some of my rookie thoughts in previous weeks, sharing my top wide receivers here, and top running backs over here. ![]() They’re worth the price of admission alone. Additionally, the boss Nate Liss was kind enough to allow the “I’m Outraged” Patrons into his mind, as he dropped his top-36 over here. Now, if for whatever reason these rankings aren’t enough for you (please don’t me and hurt my feelings as a result), you can always find more premier rookie rankings at PlayerProfiler. Inside the top-48, I ended up with: 5 quarterbacks, 15 running backs, 24 wide receivers, and 4 tight ends historic (deep) wideout class, whereas the running backs find a cliff quickly, and the tight ends are maybe all-time bad. These rankings assume superflex, as the title would suggest, and obviously full-point PPR. Throw your two favorite darts to make-up the final 50 if you so choose. Four complete rounds of rookie rankings, 48 players total, for your viewing (and drafting) pleasure. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |